
The morality of the war in Iraq is a subject that has been written about by far more eloquent writers than me. Most of these writers are leftists who conclude that the war on Iraq is immoral, because it was fought for immoral reasons. These writers rarely mention, what, if any, are moral reasons for fighting a war.
War, by definition is a brutal act that is not pleasant for anyone involved. Contrary to popular belief, those people who have fought in wars are the ones who hate it the most. They hate it, but this does not mean that they are opposed to it. I hate working out, but that doesn't mean that it's not good for me. On the contrary, sometimes those activities that we hate the most are necessary to strengthen our health as individuals, and also as a society. Still war is a pill that is particularly difficult to swallow.
Clausewitz wrote that war is "diplomacy by other means". Like diplomacy its sole purpose is to advance the national interest. Therefore one can only conclude that if any war is moral, the only wrong war is one that does not in fact further the national interest. Traditionally wars have been fought over resources, territory, or to ensure ones security. This last argument has been cited by liberals as the only morally justifiable war.
Let's get two things straight. First off I do believe that we are fighting in Iraq to preserve and enhance our own security. Second, I do not believe that this is the only morally justifiable reason for war. At least, I don't believe it in the way that liberals mean it. Liberals would have us believe that a war fought for...I don't know...oil....would be inherently immoral. Would it be more moral to have people freeze to death in the winter, or starve because food can not be harvested and delivered to market? This is an extreme case obviously, but let's just put the question out there for a minute.
What about a war fought to remove Adolf Hitler for example? If your country has not been directly attacked is it acceptable to fight for the interests of another nation-state? According to the above mentioned reasons for moral war, neither the United States nor England would have been morally justified in declaring war on Germany in World War II.
Historical revisionism tells us that nearly every war the United States has engaged in was immoral. This is no surprise since these same people also tell us that the United States is an immoral nation. Perhaps that's the real difference between liberals and conservatives. Conservatives look at a country exceedingly swimming in immorality, but still believe it to be good. Liberals begin with the premise that the country is immoral, and then go on to look for evidence of their opinion. They find that evidence every where.
According to liberals no action that the United States undertakes is moral, because our country was founded on immorality. They'll cite our treatment of Native-Americans, or African-Americans, or Japanese-Americans, and if this fails they'll resort to citing our puritan origins, while simultaneously denying that we're a Christian nation. I think it is our Christian origin that offends liberal sensibilities the most. You see to liberals, Christianity does not mean salvation and love, but rather murder and hypocricy. If you are a liberal you can not be a Christian, because then any failure on your part would make you a hypocrite, and this is the worst sin in the church of liberalism. It's better to be an unrepentant murderer than a repentent Christian adulterer, because at least the murderer never professed that murder was wrong.
It's not the war that bothers liberals. It's the fact that they do not believe that we're capable of good. We're not capable of nobility. We're not capable of victory. In liberal logic, if we failed to act to prevent genocide in Rwanda, then we got no credit for stopping ethnic cleansing in Kosovo and Bosnia. You see, the latter two actions just make us hypocrites (and rascists) for failing to intervene in an African country while intervening in a European one.
No, hypocricy can not be tolerated. Liberals loved Bill Clinton because they never expected morality from him and he met their expectations. They hate George Bush, because in Christianity they expect divinity and they find humanity. They take the people in glass houses metaphor to heart, and they're constantly on the lookout for anyone with a stone in their hand.
I used to be one of those people that believed Christianity demanded perfection. What I didn't realize at the time was that salvation will not prevent us from sinning. It's through salvation that we are forgiven. I like the Conservative world view a lot more. I like the Conservative America. In Conservative America, this country is still a shining city on a hill. We are still the greatest, most powerful, most free country on the face of the earth. We are still capable of great things, great victories. We are a great people regardless of where we came from, or what we believe. We are blessed by God, but inherently aware of our fallability. We struggle to do the right thing, and sometimes we stumble along the way, but we remain strong. Self loathing never drove a man to do great things. Defeatists never led a country to victory.